Uranium 1 in the News Again
What Is the Uranium 1 Deal and Why Does the Trump Administration Care And then Much?
WASHINGTON — President Trump's Justice Department is weighing whether to engage a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton and an Obama administration conclusion in 2010 to allow a Russian nuclear agency to purchase a company that had access to the U.s.a. uranium supply.
What is Uranium One?
Uranium One, with headquarters in Canada, is ane of the world'due south largest producers of uranium with holdings in the Us. Information technology is a subsidiary of the Russian nuclear agency, Rosatom.
At the time of the Obama administration decision to permit Rosatom to buy Uranium 1, Mrs. Clinton — Mr. Trump's opponent in the 2016 presidential race — was secretary of country. People associated with Uranium One had donated millions of dollars to the Clinton family'due south charitable organization, the Clinton Foundation.
Because the State Department was one of nine United States government agencies that signed off on the deal, questions accept been raised about whether there were any connections between deal'southward blessing and the donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Some ties between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were disclosed in a volume past Peter Schweizer, a former swain at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and frequent collaborator on films and books with Stephen K. Bannon, the executive chairman of Breitbart News and the former White Business firm chief strategist. Mr. Schweizer provided some of his information from his book, "Clinton Cash," to The New York Times, which conducted its own reporting.
Why does Mr. Trump care most the Uranium 1 deal?
Mr. Trump is frustrated with the continuing investigations into Russia's election meddling and possible ties to his campaign. Last month the special counsel announced the start charges against Trump campaign aides.
The president has said the Justice Department should instead be investigating Mrs. Clinton's involvement in the Uranium One deal and donations to her family's charitable foundation.
"Uranium deal to Russian federation, with Clinton assistance and Obama Administration cognition, is the biggest story that Fake Media doesn't want to follow!" Mr. Trump wrote in a Twitter post on October. 19.
His request has triggered a political backlash and breaks with longstanding norms established later on Watergate.
Why are we revisiting the bargain now, seven years later on?
On Monday, the Justice Department told Congress that it was looking into whether to appoint a special counsel to investigate Mrs. Clinton and the Uranium 1 deal. Earlier this yr, the section appointed a special counsel, the former F.B.I. manager Robert S. Mueller Three, to take over the regime'due south investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election and the possible involvement of Trump campaign aides.
Some Republicans have also chosen for investigations into the Uranium One bargain, including Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Representative Bob Goodlatte of Virginia — both chairmen of congressional committees that oversee the Justice Department. The Justice Section'southward letter on Monday was in response to Mr. Goodlatte's requests.
Mr. Goodlatte'due south committee and the House oversight committee are already conducting their own investigations into the Uranium I decision.
On October. 24, Mr. Grassley wrote in a Twitter postal service, "Whoever in DOJ is capable w authority to appoint a special counsel shld do so to investigate Uranium One 'whoever' means if u aren't recused."
In October, an commodity in The Hill reported that the F.B.I. had been looking into prove around the time of the Uranium One deal that Russians were offering bribes to expand their free energy interests in the United States. Mr. Mueller was the F.B.I. director at the time.
"I recollect the uranium sale to Russian federation and the way information technology was done — so underhanded, with tremendous amounts of money being passed — I actually think that's Watergate, modern age," Mr. Trump told reporters on Oct. 25.
Is there annihilation to this?
There has been no show that donations to the Clinton Foundation influenced the Uranium One bargain.
Mrs. Clinton's entrada spokesman, Brian Fallon, has said suggestions they did were "groundless."
In 2015 the F.B.I., at several of its field offices, opened preliminary investigations into the Clinton Foundation. Agents wanted to pursue a wider investigation and conduct interviews and obtain subpoenas. The F.B.I. eventually consolidated the cases at its headquarters. Former officials said that career public abuse prosecutors in Washington concluded there was not enough evidence to move forward with a case.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/14/us/politics/uranium-one-hillary-clinton.html
0 Response to "Uranium 1 in the News Again"
Post a Comment